Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last viewed.
fourteen. In the light of your position explained previously mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
R.O, Office, Gujranwala plus the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade in the accused has not been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused tried to take advantage of the program aired click here by SAMAA News, wherein the image from the petitioner was commonly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance into the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for that witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and made photographs. Aside from, the images shown within the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity right up until he was set up for an identification parade. Making photographs on the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or method, would create doubt in the proceedings with the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be sure that there is not any chance for that witness to see the accused before going towards the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the press or electronic media. Presented the reasons elaborated higher than, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
In this blog site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Discovering its provisions and also the gravity of its punishment.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.
This guide presents precious insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution could be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears as well as a new system is place in its place.
In some jurisdictions, case law could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
However, it’s essential to note that the application with the death penalty is subject to several legal safeguards and thanks process to guarantee fair trials.
Even though the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows with the possibility of reconsideration or commutation of your sentence in certain circumstances.